Chanel has prevailed in a trademark case against the reseller What Goes Around Comes Around (WGACA), a company selling vintage and pre-owned luxury goods. The New York federal court decision weighed in favor of Chanel on all four of its causes of action, awarded $4 million in statutory damages to the luxury brand in connection with counterfeiting.
The lawsuit, initiated by Chanel in March 2018, accused WGACA, a New York-based pre-owned luxury retailer, of selling counterfeit goods and implying affiliation with Chanel through advertising and marketing materials. The issues at stake in this case were not only the unlawful selling of counterfeit goods but also the unauthorized use of Chanel’s trademarks to promote WGACA's products and mislead consumers.
“The jury decision reaffirms the idea that brand equity and intellectual property rights remain paramount, even in the face of evolving consumer demand towards the circular economy models." – Jeanel Alvarado, Founder & CEO, RetailBoss
@whatgoesaroundnyc We love a vanity styled as a bag! Special shoutout to our Beverly Hills store where Kim purchased this rare find 🖤 #greenscreen #kimkardashian #kimkstyle #kimkardasianedit #celebritysighting #celebsightings #celebsightingsnyc #vintagechanel #vintagefashion #designerfashion #designerbag ♬ original sound - 🎧‹𝟹
The protection of trademarks is pivotal for luxury brands, as these symbols represent the goodwill and reputation that companies like Chanel have cultivated over many decades. In selling products that bare Chanel's trademarks without permission, WGACA could dilute the brand's exclusive status and misled consumers regarding the source and authenticity of the goods in question.
The Allegations and Defense
Chanel's lawsuit against WGACA, filed in 2018, includes claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, false advertising, and false association. The luxury brand asserts that WGACA has been selling counterfeit Chanel bags with stolen serial numbers and non-genuine Chanel items not intended for sale by the brand. Chanel argues that WGACA's use of the Chanel trademarks in marketing materials goes beyond what is necessary for identification and suggests an unauthorized affiliation with the brand.
The trial, which began on January 9, 2024, seeks to address the responsibility of resellers when counterfeit goods are sold in the secondary market and how they can promote the brands they carry. In response, WGACA argues that it should be shielded from liability under the nominative fair use doctrine. The resale company claims that it uses the Chanel trademarks solely to identify its products and does not claim any affiliation or sponsorship by Chanel.
WGACA emphasizes its role as a reputable seller of authentic luxury vintage accessories and apparel and denies the allegations of selling counterfeits. During the proceedings, Chanel presented evidence following testimony from WGACA co-founder Seth Weisser. Chanel's in-house lead counsel expressed confidence in their case and was willing to appeal if necessary. The trial also included discussions about the theft of documentation bearing 30,000 serial numbers from a Chanel supplier factory in Italy, which Chanel immediately voided to prevent their use by counterfeiters.
WGACA emphasizes its role as a reputable seller of authentic luxury vintage accessories and apparel and denies the allegations of selling counterfeits. During the proceedings, Chanel presented evidence following testimony from WGACA co-founder Seth Weisser. Chanel's in-house lead counsel expressed confidence in their case and was willing to appeal if necessary. The trial also included discussions about the theft of documentation bearing 30,000 serial numbers from a Chanel supplier factory in Italy, which Chanel immediately voided to prevent their use by counterfeiters.
Chanel winning the case has not only reaffirmed its commitment to safeguarding its brand identity but has also set a precedent for how trademark law can be applied to the secondary market of luxury goods. The outcome serves as a cautionary tale to resellers regarding the legal risks of overstepping the bounds of fair use of trademarks.
“The case may have even wider implications for the luxury reseller industry, which is currently looking for ways to balance the interests of brand owners with those of consumers seeking authenticated pre-owned goods.” – Jeanel Alvarado, Founder & CEO, RetailBoss
The Importance of the Case on Resale Market
Chanel’s victory is significant in preserving the integrity of brand identity and enforcing intellectual property rights. The case may also prompt resellers to exercise greater caution in how they promote and market their products when those products bear the trademarks of another company.
@whatgoesaroundnyc Day one in the bag! Who are you hoping to see come in today?! #nyfw #fashiontiktok #fashionweek #designerbags #designervintage #vintageshopping #hermesbirkin #birkinbag #lexiwood ♬ samsinclairfx on instagram - MOTIVATES
The outcome of the Chanel vs WGACA case could have far-reaching implications for the resale industry and luxury brands. The ruling will provide guidance on the fair use defense to trademark infringement claims for resellers. Luxury resellers will need to be cautious in marketing their products to avoid suggesting affiliation, connection, or association with luxury brand mark owners.
Timeline of the Case
To understand the developments in the Chanel vs WGACA case, let's take a chronological look at the significant filings and events leading up to the trial:
February 6, 2024: Chanel Prevails against WGACA
The court battle between Chanel and What Goes Around Comes Around in New York federal court sides with Chanel on all four of its causes of action, awarded $4 million in statutory damages to the luxury brand in connection with counterfeiting.
February 1, 2024: Dispute Over Counterfeit Goods Definition
In respective briefs to the court, Chanel and WGACA disagreed over the court's instruction regarding the definition of counterfeit goods. This point of contention could significantly impact the outcome of the trial.
February 1, 2024: WGACA Seeks Exclusion of Testimony
WGACA seeks to exclude the testimony of Chanel witness David Franklyn, along with his consumer confusion surveys and the corresponding report. WGACA argues that the testimony and surveys contain significant errors and inaccuracies.
January 31, 2024: Chanel Presents Last Jury-Facing Evidence
Chanel presents the final pieces of evidence to the jury, concluding its case. Chanel's in-house lead counsel expresses confidence in the strength of their case and indicates potential plans for an appeal if necessary.
January 31, 2024: Chanel Moves to Exclude Additional Witness Testimony
Chanel seeks to exclude the testimony of another WGACA witness, Mason Howell, arguing that he was never disclosed as a witness and that his testimony is not critical to WGACA's defense.
January 29, 2024: Clash Over Use of Chanel Founder's Quotes
Chanel and WGACA file respective filings regarding the use of quotes attributable to Coco Chanel, the brand's late founder, and her name and image. They also submit proposed jury verdict forms to the court.
January 25, 2024: Court Vacates Earlier Holding
The court announces that an error in data entry led to an incorrect ruling in a previous opinion regarding a specific bag's authenticity. The court vacates its earlier holding, impacting Chanel's trademark infringement claim related to that bag.
January 24, 2024: Chanel Seeks Exclusion of Expert Witness Testimony
Chanel moves to exclude the testimony of WGACA's expert witness, Gracie Ginn, arguing that her testimony would be unfairly prejudicial and violate rules of evidence and civil procedure.
January 12, 2024: Testimony on Theft of Serial Numbers
Executive Operations Director Joseph Bravo testifies about the theft of 30,000 serial numbers from a Chanel supplier factory in Italy. The stolen serial numbers have value to counterfeiters, and Chanel promptly voided them upon discovery.
January 9-10, 2024: Trial Begins
The trial commences with testimony from Joyce Green, managing director of Chanel France. Topics covered include WGACA's alleged sale of counterfeit handbags, unauthorized sale of point-of-sale items, and potential consumer confusion. WGACA's counsel frames the case as a David vs. Goliath scenario, emphasizing the benefits of resellers in extending the lifecycle of luxury products.
December 13, 2023: WGACA's Motion in Limine Granted
The court grants WGACA's motion to exclude evidence of certain items from previous rulings, including point-of-sale items and handbags with specific serial numbers.
December 11, 2023: General Outline for the Trial Provided
Judge Louis Stanton outlines the trial proceedings. The jury will decide liability claims and award damages, while evidence related to equitable remedies will be presented exclusively to the court.
August 25, 2023: Joint Pre-Trial Order and Expert Declarations
The parties file a joint pre-trial order, and Chanel submits declarations from expert witnesses regarding consumer surveys and damages suffered.
February 3, 2023: Proposed Pre-Trial Schedule Approved
The court approves a proposed pre-trial schedule, setting deadlines for motions, responses, replies, and a pretrial conference.
June 17, 2022: Court Orders Additional Information
The court orders WGACA to provide financial statements, sales records, and advertising data relevant to the case.
March 2018: Chanel Files Lawsuit Against WGACA
Chanel made headlines in March 2018 when it filed a lawsuit against WGACA, alleging false affiliation and the sale of infringing products. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York received the case, with Chanel asserting trademark infringement, unfair competition, false advertising, and false association claims.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult with a qualified attorney for legal guidance on specific cases or situations.
