← All reports

Market reports

The Luxury Value Gap Study: Polène Tops List

A RetailBoss ranking of ten luxury brands based on the gap between consumer-perceived value and actual market pricing.

August 2026 Global 17 pages
Visual report

Swipe through the preview. Sign in to unlock the complete deck and written analysis.

14
The Luxury Value Gap Study: Polène Tops List report page 1
Page 1 of 17
The Luxury Value Gap Study: Polène Tops List report page 2
Page 2 of 17
The Luxury Value Gap Study: Polène Tops List report page 3
Page 3 of 17
The Luxury Value Gap Study: Polène Tops List report page 4
Page 4 of 17

Free account feature

Continue the report

Unlock the remaining 13 pages and the complete written analysis.

Swipe, scroll or use the arrow keys

Report findings

The Luxury Value Gap Study: Polène Tops List — at a glance

This table follows the original report’s order and terminology. Figures relate to the study period stated below, not live measurements.

The Luxury Value Gap Study: Polène Tops List
RankBrandActual TierKey Price PointValue Gap
1PolèneContemporary / Accessible Luxury$510 (Numéro Un Nano)+55
2PradaHigh-Luxury$2,200 (Re-Edition 2005)+10
3FendiHigh-LuxuryFendi Baguette around 2,900)+5
4HermèsUltra-Luxury (Apex)$14,900 (Birkin 30)-5
5Bottega VenetaHigh-Luxury$2,650 (Mini Jodie)-5
6CelineHigh-Luxury$2,700 (Celine Mini Belt Bag)-5
7GucciHigh-Luxury$3,950 (Gucci Jackie 1961 medium bag)-20
8DiorHigh-Luxury$6,500 (Medium Lady Dior)-30
9Louis VuittonHigh-Luxury$2,030 (Neverfull MM)-30
10ChanelUltra-Luxury$11,300 (Medium Classic Flap)-58

Source and study period: RETAILBOSS analysis of consumer perceived value vs. actual price positioning, 2025-2026 pricing.

Explore the brands in this report

RetailBoss account

Read the complete analysis.

Create a free account to read the strategic context, key takeaways and methodology behind this report.

RETAILBOSS DISCOVERY

What are you looking for?

Search the stories, companies and ideas shaping retail.

Start exploring

Esc to close · Tab to navigateOpen full results →